Peter Parker will return to school when the next Spider-Man hits theaters in summer 2011. It is the beginning, and most importantly, an official statement signed by Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios. Therefore, no delay is canceled definitely 'Spider-Man 4'; goodbye to Sam Raimi, Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, among others. Welcome to a new Spider-Man 1 with new director and a new cast (to see who show called Peter Parker, if he returns to school).
In the last article I published on the subject, I dropped the "reboot" of the saga seemed the best option, but I hoped it would happen so soon. As one reader comments, just eight years have passed since the first movie, is it time to get back to the beginning again? Maybe not, but it is also true that with another superhero (and Marvel) as Hulk took even less, only been five years since Ang Lee's vision and that of Louis Leterrier, none of which worked at the box office as its producers hoped .
The news also was somewhat surprised me for other reasons. A few days ago, right after they delayed the production of 'Spider-Man 4', Maguire made a statement to the press in which he reassured the fans saying that making a movie like this was a very complicated process, very long but had a great story and he was thrilled with the idea of continuing the development of Peter Parker. You see I had no idea what really happened, or that the decision of "reboot" has been more precipitous than expected.
On the other hand,also recently, John Malkovich was in an Italian television program where he was asked about the rumor that marked him as the new villain of the franchise, playing Volture, or the Vulture. Malkovich confirmed they had spoken with him, but said he was still waiting to send him the script. Could it be that the actor was the first signing for the new Spider-Man, or perhaps it is also excluded, along with Raimi, who apparently was eager to sign him from the first film. We'll see, there is still much for the summer of 2011.
No less surprising is read, the same official statement announcing the "reboot" the new film will have a script written by James Vanderbilt ( "Zodiac"), which if you remember is the one who had written 'Spider -Man 4 ', before his work was modified by David Lindsay-Abaire, Gary Ross and Alvin Sargent, for allegedly Raimi was not entirely happy with the plot. It seems that in the end have preferred the vision of Vanderbilt, which incidentally, was contracted for two more installments. The strange thing is that I have a script, or at least a first draft, when he was talking to do anything of the quarter. Vanderbilt Was working on this, while Lindsay-Abaire, Ross and Sargent rewriting his work for 'Spider-Man 4'?
No idea, I'll leave to you, if anything seems strange to me as if they had bypassed Raimi early. I'm going for a coffee. And I'd like to read around your ideal casting. As I call the Marvel and does not have a couple of good names, I'm going to roll brown.
PD: 'Spider-Man' took 140 million and grossed 820 in the whole world, and 2 are made with 200 and grossed 780; the budget of the 3 (and last) was 260 million and made 890. Menudo business on Spiderman.
In the last article I published on the subject, I dropped the "reboot" of the saga seemed the best option, but I hoped it would happen so soon. As one reader comments, just eight years have passed since the first movie, is it time to get back to the beginning again? Maybe not, but it is also true that with another superhero (and Marvel) as Hulk took even less, only been five years since Ang Lee's vision and that of Louis Leterrier, none of which worked at the box office as its producers hoped .
The news also was somewhat surprised me for other reasons. A few days ago, right after they delayed the production of 'Spider-Man 4', Maguire made a statement to the press in which he reassured the fans saying that making a movie like this was a very complicated process, very long but had a great story and he was thrilled with the idea of continuing the development of Peter Parker. You see I had no idea what really happened, or that the decision of "reboot" has been more precipitous than expected.
On the other hand,also recently, John Malkovich was in an Italian television program where he was asked about the rumor that marked him as the new villain of the franchise, playing Volture, or the Vulture. Malkovich confirmed they had spoken with him, but said he was still waiting to send him the script. Could it be that the actor was the first signing for the new Spider-Man, or perhaps it is also excluded, along with Raimi, who apparently was eager to sign him from the first film. We'll see, there is still much for the summer of 2011.
No less surprising is read, the same official statement announcing the "reboot" the new film will have a script written by James Vanderbilt ( "Zodiac"), which if you remember is the one who had written 'Spider -Man 4 ', before his work was modified by David Lindsay-Abaire, Gary Ross and Alvin Sargent, for allegedly Raimi was not entirely happy with the plot. It seems that in the end have preferred the vision of Vanderbilt, which incidentally, was contracted for two more installments. The strange thing is that I have a script, or at least a first draft, when he was talking to do anything of the quarter. Vanderbilt Was working on this, while Lindsay-Abaire, Ross and Sargent rewriting his work for 'Spider-Man 4'?
No idea, I'll leave to you, if anything seems strange to me as if they had bypassed Raimi early. I'm going for a coffee. And I'd like to read around your ideal casting. As I call the Marvel and does not have a couple of good names, I'm going to roll brown.
PD: 'Spider-Man' took 140 million and grossed 820 in the whole world, and 2 are made with 200 and grossed 780; the budget of the 3 (and last) was 260 million and made 890. Menudo business on Spiderman.


0 коментара:
Постави коментар